netdev - Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 2/3] bridge: Add filtering support for default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:21:30 +0900
From:	Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>
To:	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>, shemminger@...tta.com,
	bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 2/3] bridge: Add filtering support for default_pvid

(14/09/13 (土) 5:44), Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> Currently when vlan filtering is turned on on the bridge, the bridge
> will drop all traffic untill the user configures the filter.  This
> isn't very nice for ports that don't care about vlans and just
> want untagged traffic.
> 
> A concept of a default_pvid was recently introduced.  This patch
> adds filtering support for default_pvid.   Now, ports that don't
> care about vlans and don't define there own filter will belong
> to the VLAN of the default_pvid and continue to receive untagged
> traffic.

If user sets pvid, then vid 1 (default_pvid) will become non-pvid but
still not be filtered, right?
vlan_bitmap of default_pvid shouldn't be cleared on setting pvid?

Thanks,
Toshiaki Makita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html