netdev - Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 0/3] sunvnet: add jumbo frames support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:33:24 -0400
From:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:	David L Stevens <david.stevens@...cle.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 0/3] sunvnet: add jumbo frames support

> 
>  arch/sparc/include/asm/vio.h       |   44 ++++++++++-
>  arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c            |    2 +-
>  arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c          |   14 +++-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c |  146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.h |    7 ++-
>  5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 

A logistical question- this patch-set spans both sparc-next/sparclinux 
net-next/netdev, and there are obviously some dependancies here. 
What's the prescribed way to handle this sort of thing? 

(I ask, because I expect to soon be confronting a similar question with
some Rx side latency improvements that I'm working on, which will require
new functions for enabling/disabling interrupts in arch/sparc/kernel,
and I am wondering how that should get sequenced).

--Sowmini

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html