netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH] dql: add a burst attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:46:42 +0200
From:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>, toke@...e.dk,
	brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] dql: add a burst attribute

On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:55:36 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 16:31 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > > If you feel not comfortable with "burst", rename it to whatever you
> > > think is best.
> > > But please, do not hard code magic 7 in your code.
> > 
> > I had hoped that this 'magic' value could be removed
> > completely, only using bql data for bulking decisions.
> 
> But it is apparently not the case, since you guys decided to had it set
> to 8, then to 7 later, based on experiments.

The "magic" limit is only a conservative save guard.  We do plan to
remove this completely.  That is the reason for not exporting this, as
we want free-hands to remove this completely.

Guess, I'll remove it completely now, so we can move on.


I would like some off/on switch, exported to userspace, for disabling
this bulking (then we don't need this conservative magic number).  How
would that be done best?

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html