netdev - Re: [PATCH V1 net-next 2/4] net/mlx5_core: Use hardware registers description header file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:56:15 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc:	eli@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
	yevgenyp@...lanox.com, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 net-next 2/4] net/mlx5_core: Use hardware registers
 description header file

From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:12:10 -0700

>> +#define MLX5_SET64(typ, p, fld, v) do { \
>> +       if (__mlx5_bit_sz(typ, fld) != 64) \
>> +               non_existent_function(); \
>> +       else if (__mlx5_bit_off(typ, fld) % 64) \
>> +               non_existent_function(); \
>> +       else \
>> +               *((__be64 *)(p) + __mlx5_64_off(typ, fld)) = cpu_to_be64(v); \
>> +} while (0)
> 
> is it possible to use BUILD_BUG_ON instead of runtime pr_info() ?

Indeed, please don't invent your own facilities for compile-time checks,
we have BUILD_BUG_ON() so please use it instead of non_existent_function()
which BTW doesn't work with some non-gcc compilers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html