netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: Fix build warning for !PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:35:00 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: Fix build warning for !PM_SLEEP

On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:24:52PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Date: Wed,  1 Oct 2014 13:59:00 +0200
> 
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> > 
> > The dsa_switch_suspend() and dsa_switch_resume() functions are only used
> > when PM_SLEEP is enabled, so they need #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP protection
> > to avoid a compiler warning.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> 
> Applied.
> 
> Please, in the future, explicitly indicate what tree your changes
> are against.  Through trial and error I figured out that this could
> only apply to net-next, but that's not a good use of my time.

I had assumed that working on top of linux-next is what most people were
doing anyway therefore net-next would be the default to apply patches to
unless otherwise stated.

But if this inconveniences you I'll try to remember to explicitly state
which tree it's based on in the future.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped