[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:32:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com
Cc: alexander.duyck@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flow-dissector: Fix alignment issue in
__skb_flow_get_ports
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:53:35 -0700
> On 10/10/2014 11:22 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:15:59 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>>> Your original code works because you do things like "byte[12] & 0xf0"
>>> to
>>> extract these fields.
>> Changing that th->doff sequence to instead be:
>>
>> const u8 *bp;
>> u8 buf[13];
>>
>> bp = __skb_header_pointer(skb, poff, sizeof(buf),
>> data, hlen, &buf);
>> if (!bp)
>> return poff;
>>
>> poff += max_t(u32, sizeof(struct tcphdr), (bp[12] & 0xf0) >> 2);
>> break;
>>
>> on top of your v3 patch works for me.
>>
>> Please double-check my calculations.
>
> Any reason why you are grabbing all 13 bytes instead of just the 1 we
> care about? Seems like we could just use a u8 buf instead of the
> array since we are only grabbing doff.
No reason, just a thinko, my brain implemented this as if skb_header_pointer
worked like skb_pull :-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists