lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 15 Oct 2014 02:30:33 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Vasily Averin <vvs@...allels.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: dst_entry leak in ip_append_data()

On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 10:56 +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
> On 15.10.2014 08:46, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 08:57 +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
> >> v2: adjust the indentation of the arguments __ip_append_data() call
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2e77d89b2fa8 ("net: avoid a pair of dst_hold()/dst_release() in ip_append_data()")
> >>
> >> If sk_write_queue is empty ip_append_data() executes ip_setup_cork()
> >> that "steals" dst entry from rt to cork. Later it calls __ip_append_data()
> >> that creates skb and adds it to sk_write_queue.
> >>
> >> If skb was added successfully following ip_push_pending_frames() call
> >> reassign dst entries from cork to skb, and kfree_skb frees dst_entry.
> >>
> >> However nobody frees stolen dst_entry if skb was not added into sk_write_queue.
> > 
> > I thought this was done by ip_flush_pending_frames() ?
> 
> Take look at ip_send_unicast_reply():

So maybe the bug is here ?


> 
> ip_flush_pending_frames() is not called if skb was not added to sk_write_queue.
> And ip_rt_put() does not work, because dst entry was stolen in ip_setup_cork().
> 
> Probably it can happen in raw_sendmsg() and udp_sendmsg() too.

UDP & RAW do :

err = ip_append_data(...);
if (err)
    udp_flush_pending_frames(sk);


It seems you chose to add a test in fast path, with not even adding an
unlikely() clause, while it seems that we took care of all the cases but
missed a single one : ip_send_unicast_reply()

I am suggesting to fix this bug in another way.

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists