lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:52:22 -0700
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	Petri Gynther <pgynther@...gle.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: bcmgenet: return number of packets
 completed in TX reclaim

On 10/24/2014 03:20 PM, Petri Gynther wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>> In preparation for reclaiming transmitted buffers in NAPI context,
>> update __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim() and bcmgenet_tx_reclaim() to return the
>> number of packets completed per call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> index ee4d5baf09b6..70f2fb366375 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> @@ -876,14 +876,14 @@ static inline void bcmgenet_tx_ring_int_disable(struct bcmgenet_priv *priv,
>>  }
>>
>>  /* Unlocked version of the reclaim routine */
>> -static void __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(struct net_device *dev,
>> -                                 struct bcmgenet_tx_ring *ring)
>> +static unsigned int __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(struct net_device *dev,
>> +                                         struct bcmgenet_tx_ring *ring)
>>  {
>>         struct bcmgenet_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>         int last_tx_cn, last_c_index, num_tx_bds;
>>         struct enet_cb *tx_cb_ptr;
>>         struct netdev_queue *txq;
>> -       unsigned int bds_compl;
>> +       unsigned int bds_compl, pkts_compl = 0;
> 
> bcmgenet_desc_rx() uses "rxpktprocessed", so I'd go with "txpktprocessed" here.

Sure.

> 
>>         unsigned int c_index;
>>
>>         /* Compute how many buffers are transmitted since last xmit call */
>> @@ -928,6 +928,7 @@ static void __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(struct net_device *dev,
>>                 }
>>                 dev->stats.tx_packets++;
>>                 ring->free_bds += bds_compl;
>> +               pkts_compl += bds_compl;
> 
> This change doesn't look correct. The number of cleaned packets is not
> necessarily equal to the number of cleaned TxBDs.

Right, that should be a +1 increment, it does not matter because what we
want to know is 0 versus anything else.

> 
> I think that the while-loop should be:
> 
>         while (last_tx_cn-- > 0) {
>                 tx_cb_ptr = ring->cbs + last_c_index;
> 
>                 if (tx_cb_ptr->skb) {
>                         pkts_compl++;
>                         dev->stats.tx_packets++;
>                         dev->stats.tx_bytes += tx_cb_ptr->skb->len;
>                         dma_unmap_single(&dev->dev,
>                                          dma_unmap_addr(tx_cb_ptr, dma_addr),
>                                          tx_cb_ptr->skb->len,
>                                          DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>                         bcmgenet_free_cb(tx_cb_ptr);
>                 } else if (dma_unmap_addr(tx_cb_ptr, dma_addr)) {
>                         dev->stats.tx_bytes +=
>                                 dma_unmap_len(tx_cb_ptr, dma_len);
>                         dma_unmap_page(&dev->dev,
>                                        dma_unmap_addr(tx_cb_ptr, dma_addr),
>                                        dma_unmap_len(tx_cb_ptr, dma_len),
>                                        DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>                         dma_unmap_addr_set(tx_cb_ptr, dma_addr, 0);
>                 }
>                 ring->free_bds++;
>                 last_c_index++;
>                 last_c_index &= (num_tx_bds - 1);
>         }
> 
>>
>>                 last_c_index++;
>>                 last_c_index &= (num_tx_bds - 1);
>> @@ -936,20 +937,25 @@ static void __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(struct net_device *dev,
>>         if (ring->free_bds > (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))
>>                 ring->int_disable(priv, ring);
>>
>> -       if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq))
>> +       if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && pkts_compl)
> 
> bcmgenet_xmit() stops the Tx queue when:
> ring->free_bds <= (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)
> 
> So, shouldn't this check be:
> netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && (ring->free_bds > (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))
> 
> Having said that --
> Why does the driver stop the Tx queue when there are still
> (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1) TxBDs left?
> It leaves 17 or so TxBDs unused on the Tx ring, and most of the
> packets are not fragmented.

Right, this is something I am still trying to understand. One one hand
it does make sense to stop the queue on MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 just to be
safe and allow for a full-size fragment to be pushed on the next xmit()
call. But by the same token, bcmgenet_xmit() will check for the actual
fragment size early on.

I think the only one which is valid is the one at the end of
bcmgenet_xmit(), this one in bcmgenet_tx_reclaim() should just verify
that we have released some packets and that the queue was previous stopped.

> 
> I feel that bcmgenet_xmit() should stop the Tx queue only when there
> is 1 TxBD left after putting a new packet on the ring.
> 
>>                 netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
>>
>>         ring->c_index = c_index;
>> +
>> +       return pkts_compl;
>>  }
>>
>> -static void bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(struct net_device *dev,
>> -                               struct bcmgenet_tx_ring *ring)
>> +static unsigned int bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(struct net_device *dev,
>> +                                       struct bcmgenet_tx_ring *ring)
>>  {
>>         unsigned long flags;
>> +       unsigned int pkts_compl;
>>
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->lock, flags);
>> -       __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(dev, ring);
>> +       pkts_compl = __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(dev, ring);
>>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +       return pkts_compl;
>>  }
>>
>>  static void bcmgenet_tx_reclaim_all(struct net_device *dev)
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ