netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: introduce SO_INCOMING

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:08:26 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ycai@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com,
	ncardwell@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: introduce SO_INCOMING_CPU

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:51:12 -0800

> @@ -1455,6 +1455,7 @@ process:
>  		goto discard_and_relse;
>  
>  	sk_mark_napi_id(sk, skb);
> +	sk_incoming_cpu_update(sk);

Just make sk_mark_napi_id() call sk_incoming_cpu_update().

You've matched up the calls precisely in this patch, and I can't think
of any situation where we'd add a sk_mark_napi_call() not not want to
do an sk_incoming_cpu_update().

If, alternatively, you want to have a helper function that does both
things and has a special name, that's fine too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html