netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] fast_hash: clobber registers correctly for inline function use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:35:09 +0100
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ogerlitz@...lanox.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
	jesse@...ira.com, discuss@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fast_hash: clobber registers correctly for
 inline function use

On Fr, 2014-11-14 at 12:15 -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> 
> >On Fr, 2014-11-14 at 13:38 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> >> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:46:18 +0100
> >> 
> >> > I would still like to see the current proposed fix getting applied and
> >> > we can do this on-top. The inline call after this patch reassembles a
> >> > direct function call, so besides the long list of clobbers, it should
> >> > still be pretty fast.
> >> 
> >> I would rather revert the change entirely until it is implemented
> >> properly.
> >> 
> >> Also, I am strongly of the opinion that this is a mis-use of the
> >> alternative call interface.  It was never intended to be used for
> >> things that can make real function calls.
> >
> >I tend to disagree. Grepping e.g. shows
> >
> >        alternative_call_2(copy_user_generic_unrolled,
> >                         copy_user_generic_string,
> >                         X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD,
> >                         copy_user_enhanced_fast_string,
> >                         X86_FEATURE_ERMS,
> >                         ASM_OUTPUT2("=a" (ret), "=D" (to), "=S" (from),
> >                                     "=d" (len)),
> >                         "1" (to), "2" (from), "3" (len)
> >                         : "memory", "rcx", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
> >
> >
> >(it has a few less clobbers because it has more output operands)
> 
> 	As those functions (copy_user_generic_unrolled, et al) are all
> in assembly language, presumably the list of clobbered registers can be
> had via inspection.
> 
> 	For the arch_fast_hash2 case, the functions (__intel_crc4_2_hash
> and __jash2) are both written in C, so how would the clobber list be
> created?

I created it via the function calling convention documented in
arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h, so I specified each register which a
function is allowed to clobber with.

I currently cannot see how I can resolve the invalid constraints error
easily. :(

So either go with my first patch, which I puts the alternative_call
switch point into its own function without ever inlining or the patch
needs to be reverted. :/

Bye,
Hannes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html