lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 08:41:52 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] macvtap: advance iov iterator when needed in
 macvtap_put_user()

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:34:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:31:05PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > When mergeable buffer is used, vnet_hdr_sz is greater than sizeof struct
> > virtio_net_hdr. So we need advance the iov iterators in this case.
> > 
> > Fixes 6c36d2e26cda1ad3e2c4b90dd843825fc62fe5b4 ("macvtap: Use iovec iterators")
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

I'm not sure it's a good behaviour, actually - should we just leave an
unmodified gap in userland buffer there, with whatever garbage it might
have contained?

I do realize that this is what we used to do, but it might end up a source
of hard to debug userland bugs...  Perhaps that iov_iter_advance(iter, size)
would better be replaced with iov_iter_zero(size, iter)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ