netdev - Re: [PATCH net] gso: do GSO for local skb with size bigger than MTU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Dec 2014 19:34:01 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	"Du, Fan" <fan.du@...el.com>, "'Jason Wang'" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"fw@...len.de" <fw@...len.de>, dev@...nvswitch.org,
	jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] gso: do GSO for local skb with size bigger than MTU

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:09:27PM +0000, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 12/02/14 at 01:48pm, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > What about containers or any other virtualization environment that
> > doesn't use Virtio?
> 
> The host can dictate the MTU in that case for both veth or OVS
> internal which would be primary container plumbing techniques.

It typically can't do this easily for VMs with emulated devices:
real ethernet uses a fixed MTU.

IMHO it's confusing to suggest MTU as a fix for this bug, it's
an unrelated optimization.
ICMP_DEST_UNREACH/ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED is the right fix here.


> ivshmem would need it's own fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html