netdev - Re: atomic operations bottleneck in the IPv6 stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:16:03 +0100
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
To:	"cristian.bercaru@...escale.com" <cristian.bercaru@...escale.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"R89243@...escale.com" <R89243@...escale.com>,
	Madalin-Cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>,
	"Razvan.Ungureanu@...escale.com" <Razvan.Ungureanu@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: atomic operations bottleneck in the IPv6 stack

On Mi, 2014-12-10 at 16:56 +0000, cristian.bercaru@...escale.com wrote:
> 
> It seems to me that the atomic operations on the IPv6 forwarding path
> are a bottleneck and they are not scalable with the number of cores.
> Am I right? What improvements can be brought to the IPv6 kernel code
> to make it less dependent of atomic operations/variables?

For a starter, something like the following commit:

commit d26b3a7c4b3b26319f18bb645de93eba8f4bdcd5
Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date:   Tue Jul 31 05:45:30 2012 +0000

    ipv4: percpu nh_rth_output cache

Bye,
Hannes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html