netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] swdevice: add new api to set and del bridge port attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:37:55 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	sfeldma@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, bcrl@...ck.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	linville@...driver.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	shm@...ulusnetworks.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] swdevice: add new api to set and del
 bridge port attributes

Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:05:18AM CET, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
>This patch adds two new api's netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink
>and netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink to offload bridge port attributes
>to switch asic
>
>(The names of the apis look odd with 'switch_port_bridge',
>but am more inclined to change the prefix of the api to something else.
>Will take any suggestions).
>
>The api's look at the NETIF_F_HW_NETFUNC_OFFLOAD feature flag to
>pass bridge port attributes to the port device.
>
>If the device has the NETIF_F_HW_NETFUNC_OFFLOAD, but does not support
>the bridge port attribute offload ndo, call bridge port attribute ndo's on
>the lowerdevs if supported. This is one way to pass bridge port attributes
>through stacked netdevs (example when bridge port is a bond and bond slaves
>are switch ports).
>
>Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>---
> include/net/switchdev.h   |    5 +++-
> net/switchdev/switchdev.c |   70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
>index 8a6d164..22676b6 100644
>--- a/include/net/switchdev.h
>+++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
>@@ -17,7 +17,10 @@
> int netdev_switch_parent_id_get(struct net_device *dev,
> 				struct netdev_phys_item_id *psid);
> int netdev_switch_port_stp_update(struct net_device *dev, u8 state);
>-
>+int netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink(struct net_device *dev,
>+				struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u16 flags);
>+int netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink(struct net_device *dev,
>+				struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u16 flags);
> #else
> 
> static inline int netdev_switch_parent_id_get(struct net_device *dev,
>diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>index d162b21..62317e1 100644
>--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>+++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>@@ -50,3 +50,73 @@ int netdev_switch_port_stp_update(struct net_device *dev, u8 state)
> 	return ops->ndo_switch_port_stp_update(dev, state);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_switch_port_stp_update);
>+
>+/**
>+ *	netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink - Notify switch device port of bridge
>+ *	port attributes
>+ *
>+ *	@dev: port device
>+ *	@nlh: netlink msg with bridge port attributes
>+ *
>+ *	Notify switch device port of bridge port attributes
>+ */
>+int netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink(struct net_device *dev,
>+									  struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u16 flags)
>+{
>+	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
>+	struct net_device *lower_dev;
>+	struct list_head *iter;
>+	int ret = 0, err = 0;
>+
>+	if (!(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_NETFUNC_OFFLOAD))
>+		return err;
>+
>+	if (ops->ndo_bridge_setlink) {
>+	    WARN_ON(!ops->ndo_switch_parent_id_get);
>+	    return ops->ndo_bridge_setlink(dev, nlh, flags);

	You have to change ndo_bridge_setlink in netdevice.h first.
	Otherwise when only this patch is applied (during bisection)
	this won't compile.


>+	}
>+
>+	netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {

	I do not understand why to iterate over lower devices. At this
	stage we don't know a thing about this upper or its lowers. Let
	the uppers (/masters) to decide if this needs to be propagated
	or not.

>+		err = netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink(lower_dev, nlh, flags);
>+		if (err)
>+			ret = err;
>+    }

 ^^^^^ Indent is off. This should be catched by scripts/checkpatch.pl.

>+
>+	return ret;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink);
>+
>+/**
>+ *	netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink - Notify switch device port of bridge
>+ *	attribute delete
>+ *
>+ *	@dev: port device
>+ *	@nlh: netlink msg with bridge port attributes
>+ *
>+ *	Notify switch device port of bridge port attribute delete
>+ */
>+int netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink(struct net_device *dev,
>+									  struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u16 flags)
>+{
>+	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
>+	struct net_device *lower_dev;
>+	struct list_head *iter;
>+	int ret = 0, err = 0;
>+
>+	if (!(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_NETFUNC_OFFLOAD))
>+		return err;
>+
>+	if (ops->ndo_bridge_dellink) {
>+		WARN_ON(!ops->ndo_switch_parent_id_get);
>+		return ops->ndo_bridge_dellink(dev, nlh, flags);
>+	}
>+
>+	netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
>+		err = netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink(lower_dev, nlh, flags);
>+		if (err)
>+			ret = err;
>+	}
>+
>+	return ret;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink);
>-- 
>1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html