netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if ndo_fdb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:40:05 -0500
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Hubert Sokolowski <h.sokolowski@....edu.pl>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if
 ndo_fdb_dump is defined.

On 12/11/14 12:32, Roopa Prabhu wrote:

>>
> Thanks. yes, that is a problem. And, this mac0 is not a bridge port
> correct ?.
>

Aha. I think this is the key. It is NOT a bridge port. This is why i
was explicit to ask for the commit log tests to be run.

> But, for the same test case, when mac0 is a bridge port, does your patch
> under review make both the entries go away for a bridge port ?.
> (If i understand jamal correctly, this is his concern).

I am interested to see the answer.
More importantly I am hoping Vlad would wake up and say something.

cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html