netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamping default mode flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:32:56 +0100
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, luto@...capital.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamping default
 mode flag

On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 12:31:59PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> 
> The number of timestamping points along the transmit path has grown,
> as have the options. Preferred behavior is to request timestamps with
> ID, without data (which enables batching) and for all supported
> timestamp points. Define a short option that enables all these
> defaults.

This "preferred behavior" is subjective, and it depends on the
application.  I am sure it reflects your own interest, but for people
doing PTP over UDP or raw, it is a bit misleading.

I would drop this default and just let applications define their own.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html