[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:27:41 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: cwang@...pensource.com
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: Is sch_teql still useful?
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:23:32 -0800
> Since we have bonding alb, is it still needed to have sch_teql since
> they do the same thing, load balancing over multiple interfaces? Also
> sch_teql mixes netdevice with qdisc, which somewhat breaks the
> abstraction?
>
> I don't dig the history so I could easily miss something here.
I can't comment as to it's usefulness, but I will note that we don't
have the option of removing it if you are thinking about doing so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists