netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Use 'const void *' instead of 'void *' for 2nd parameter of hci_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Feb 2015 23:13:28 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
	'Chen Gang S' <gang.chen@...rus.com.cn>,
	"marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	"gustavo@...ovan.org" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	"johan.hedberg@...il.com" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Use 'const void *' instead
 of 'void *' for 2nd parameter of hci_test_bit()

Hello.

On 02/04/2015 02:59 PM, David Laight wrote:

>> -static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, void *addr)
>> +static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, const void *addr)
>>   {
>>   	return *((__u32 *) addr + (nr >> 5)) & ((__u32) 1 << (nr & 31));
>>   }

> Is there a 'standard' function lurking that will do the above.
> On x86 the cpus 'bit test' instruction will handle bit numbers
> greater than the word size - so it can be a single instruction.

    Of course, there's test_bit().

> 	David

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html