netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Indirect phy access for mv88e6171

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:20:47 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Indirect phy access for mv88e6171

On 02/15/2015 01:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2015-02-15 12:25 GMT-08:00 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>:
>>> I'll try. My primary problem right now is that I run Lennert Buytenhek's
>>> patch set to support bridging offload (aka hardware bridging) on top of
>>> the upstream dsa code, and the upstream code now supports a competing /
>>> alternate means  to support bridging/switching offload (NET_SWITCHDEV)
>>> which doesn't work with dsa (at least not yet). So I'll have to figure
>>> out if / how I can run your patches with my code base, or how I can add
>>> add support for NET_SWITCHDEV into dsa.
>>
>> We should be adding switchdev support to DSA for hardware
>> bridging. The concepts in Lennert Buytenhek's should be a good
>> starting point for this.
>
> In fact, there is not much to be implemented in DSA, since we already
> have everything in place in net-next now:
>
> - net_device notifier to learn which ports are leaving/joining the bridge
> - hook an abstraction for ndo_switch_port_stp_update
> - hook an abstraction for ndo_fdb_{add,del,dump}
>
>>
>>> Do you know if there are any efforts going on in that direction ?
>>
>> Florian has expressed an interest in getting hardware bridging
>> working. I've no idea if he has looked at it from the perspective of
>> switchdev.
>
> I have some patches that leverage the switchdev-related patches and
> bring an abstraction to DSA, they should not be fundamentally
> different at the DSA driver level, since most of the abstraction is
> done in net/dsa/slave.c, I plan on posting these patches tomorrow once
> I am back home. I tested these with the bcm_sf2 driver, so testing
> with Marvell hardware would be more than welcome.
>

Sounds good. I would be more than happy to test the code with the
Marvell hardware.

My current status is that I got Lennert's patches running on top of
the latest version of the dsa code, including the switchdev changes.
It currently uses ndo_switch_port_stp_update, but I still have
ndo_bridge_join, ndo_bridge_leave, and ndo_bridge_port_flush
as added callbacks.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html