netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] Add NTF_EXT_AGED to control FDB ageing in SW or HW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:29:33 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andrew@...n.ch
Cc:	sfeldma@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
	vbandaru@...adcom.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, linux@...ck-us.net,
	gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, siva.mannem.lnx@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] Add NTF_EXT_AGED to control FDB
 ageing in SW or HW

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:31:13 +0100

> I don't think this is going to work. There is no efficient way to get
> the hardware tables out of the hardware. We don't get notification of
> additions or removals. We can only read the whole table. And it can be
> expensive to read the whole table, since it can be 1K or more entries,
> going over an MDIO bus, which in the worst case can be bit banging on
> gpio lines.

Agreed, for most chips, this is how things seem to be structured.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html