netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Neighbour table prep for MPLS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:04:35 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Neighbour table prep for MPLS

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:53:21 -0600

> We could potentially translate the numbers into the enumeration that is
> NEIGH_ARP_TABLE, NEIGH_ND_TABLE, and NEIGH_DN_TABLE.  Or waste a little
> bit of memory in have a 30 entry array and looking things up by address
> protocol number.   The only disadvantage I can see to using AF_NNN as
> the index is that it might be a little less cache friendly.

Yes, you can just store NEIGH_*_TABLE in your route entries and
pass that directly into neigh_xmit(), or something like that.

> Other issues the hh header cache doesn't work. (How much do we care).
> 
> I worry a little that supporting AF_PACKET case might cause problems
> in the future.
> 
> The cumulus folks are probably going to want to use neigh_xmit so they
> can have ipv6 nexthops on ipv4.  Using this for IPv4 and loosing the
> header cache worries me a little.

We can have variable hard header caches per neigh entry if we really
want to.  The only issue is, again, making the demux simple.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html