netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] mpls: Use definition for reserved label checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:12:52 +0000
From:	Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] mpls: Use definition for reserved label
 checks

On 20/03/15 00:41, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com> writes:
>> diff --git a/net/mpls/internal.h b/net/mpls/internal.h
>> index fb6de92..d06dff9 100644
>> --- a/net/mpls/internal.h
>> +++ b/net/mpls/internal.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #define LABEL_GAL			13 /* RFC5586 */
>>   #define LABEL_OAM_ALERT			14 /* RFC3429 */
>>   #define LABEL_EXTENSION			15 /* RFC7274 */
>> +#define LABEL_FIRST_UNRESERVED		16 /* RFC7274 */
>
> This should reference RFC3032 not RFC7274 as RFC3032 is what defines
> the first 16 labels as reserved.

Thanks - I'll fix that and resend the series.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html