netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipvlan: fix addr hash list corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:00:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jbenc@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, maheshb@...gle.com, dcbw@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvlan: fix addr hash list corruption

From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:10:19 +0100

> @@ -504,7 +504,8 @@ static void ipvlan_link_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
>  
>  	if (ipvlan->ipv6cnt > 0 || ipvlan->ipv4cnt > 0) {
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(addr, next, &ipvlan->addrs, anode) {
> -			ipvlan_ht_addr_del(addr, !dev->dismantle);
> +			if (netif_running(dev))
> +				ipvlan_ht_addr_del(addr, !dev->dismantle);
>  			list_del_rcu(&addr->anode);
>  		}
>  	}

This is so error prone, because you are depending upon so many implementation
details to infer a boolean state "is this address hashed".

So just add the boolean state to struct ipvl_addr, and manage it in
the ipvlan_ht_addr_{add,del}() code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html