lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 10:43:55 +0900 From: Hajime Tazaki <tazaki@...e.ad.jp> To: rusty@...tcorp.com.au Cc: richard@....at, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, corbet@....net, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jdike@...toit.com, mathieu.lacage@...il.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS) Thanks Rusty, At Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:59:39 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Hajime Tazaki <tazaki@....wide.ad.jp> writes: > > the issue here is the decision between 'no-ops' and > > 'assert(false)' depends on the context. an auto-generated > > mechanism needs some hand-written parameters I think. > > Yes, I used auto-generated (fprintf, abort) stubs for similar testing in > pettycoin, where if it failed to link it would generate such stubs > for undefined symbols. > > It's not a panacea, but it helps speed up rejiggin after code changes. > Generating noop stubs can actually make that process slower, as you can > get failures because you now need to do something in that stub. is it the following ? it's really cool stuff ! https://github.com/rustyrussell/pettycoin/blob/master/test/mockup.sh -- Hajime -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists