netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tc: make ingress and egress qdiscs consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Apr 2015 20:22:34 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	daniel@...earbox.net, jiri@...nulli.us, jhs@...atatu.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tc: make ingress and egress qdiscs consistent

On 4/7/15 7:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
> Date: Tue,  7 Apr 2015 18:03:45 -0700
>
>> +
>> +	/* don't recompute skb->csum back and forth while pushing/pulling L2 */
>> +	__skb_push(skb, hard_header_len);
>>   	result = tc_classify(skb, fl, &res);
>> +	__skb_pull(skb, hard_header_len);
>
> This is not legal.
>
> This SKB can be referenced by other entities, such as AF_PACKET
> sockets and other network taps on input.  You absolutely do not
> have private access to this SKB object, and any modification you
> make to it will be seen by others.
>
> Therefore you cannot push and pull the headers, because that
> modification will be seen by the other entities referencing this SKB.

ohh, yes. Spent too much time looking at TC that forgot the obvious.
Was modeling this one by skb_defer_rx_timestamp() which is called before
taps. My v1 patch was obviously broken too :(

> And you do not want to add this expensive operation here.
>
> That would be really stupid overhead just to accomodate BPF things.

skb_share_check is only expensive if taps are active and
not only cls_bpf, but ematch and bunch of other cls/acts assume L2,
but it seems no one cares about using them with ingress, so I'll go back
to cls_bpf specific skb_share_check and push.
Other classifiers that care about attaching to ingress would need
to do the same thing or play nicely with offsets. Fair enough.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html