lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:56:23 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
CC:	matti.gottlieb@...el.com, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ipv4: add option to drop gratuitous ARP packets

Hello.

On 4/10/2015 10:54 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>

> In certain 802.11 wireless deployments, there will be ARP proxies
> that use knowledge of the network to correctly answer requests.
> To prevent gratuitous ARP frames on the shared medium from being
> a problem, on such deployments wireless needs to drop them.

> Enable this by providing an option called "drop_gratuitous_arp".

> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt | 6 ++++++
>   include/uapi/linux/ip.h                | 1 +
>   net/ipv4/arp.c                         | 8 ++++++++
>   net/ipv4/devinet.c                     | 2 ++
>   4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

[...]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> index 5f5c674e130a..5487d5e5191e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> @@ -715,6 +715,14 @@ static int arp_process(struct sk_buff *skb)
>   	    (!IN_DEV_ROUTE_LOCALNET(in_dev) && ipv4_is_loopback(tip)))
>   		goto out;
>
> + /*
> +  *	For some 802.11 wireless deployments (and possibly other networks),
> +  *	there will be an ARP proxy and gratuitous ARP frames are attacks
> +  *	and thus should not be accepted.
> +  */

    Hm, why this strange indentation?

> +	if (IN_DEV_CONF_GET(in_dev, DROP_GRATUITOUS_ARP) && sip == tip)
> +		goto out;
> +
>   /*
>    *     Special case: We must set Frame Relay source Q.922 address
>    */
[...]

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ