netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv4: add option to drop unicast encapsulated in L2 multicast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:04:46 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	matti.gottlieb@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv4: add option to drop unicast encapsulated in L2
 multicast


	Hello,

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Johannes Berg wrote:

> > - CLUSTERIP works in LOCAL_IN (after ip_rcv_finish), LOCAL_IN
> > is here: ip_rcv_finish->dst_input->ip_local_deliver->
> > ip_local_deliver_finish
> 
> It's just that the later this is, the more nervous I get about it being
> really effective. :)
> 
> I'm willing to discount the CLUSTERIP case, it seems insane to want to
> run CLUSTERIP over wifi on a network that explicitly limits multicast.
> 
> Other than that, do you see any reason for not putting it in
> ip_rcv_finish()?

	ok, I don't remember for other cases.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html