lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:39:29 -0700
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	"Shengzhou.Liu@...escale.com" <Shengzhou.Liu@...escale.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"joe.hershberger@...il.com" <joe.hershberger@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/phy: refactor RTL8211F initialization

Le 22/04/2015 20:53, Shengzhou.Liu@...escale.com a écrit :
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.fainelli@...il.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:57 AM
>> To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685; netdev@...r.kernel.org; joe.hershberger@...il.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/phy: refactor RTL8211F initialization
>>
>> On 22/04/15 03:22, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>>> RTL8211F needs to enalbe TXDLY for RGMII during phy initialization, so
>>> move it to rtl8211f_config for early initialization.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@...escale.com>
>>> cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/phy/realtek.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c b/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
>>> index 3917c82..d48095b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
>>> @@ -43,6 +43,22 @@ static int rtl8211x_config(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static int rtl8211f_config(struct phy_device *phydev) {
>>> +	phy_write(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_BMCR, BMCR_RESET);
>>
>> That part of the change is not documented but has to be, and you should use
>> genphy_soft_reset() which also takes care of waiting the required amount of
>> time before BMCR_RESET is cleared.
> 
> There is no genphy_soft_reset() in current u-boot tree. 

Did you mean to submit that against u-boot or Linux? If the latter,
there is absolutely no need to have the same file compile under u-boot
and Linux without changes, that is too restrictive. There is a
genphy_soft_reset() which takes care of waiting for BMCR_RESET to clear,
please use it, there is no guarantee otherwise that a PHY has completed
a reset.
--
Florian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists