netdev - Re: [PATCH next 1/3] ipvlan: Defer multicast / broadcast processing to a work-queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:40:29 -0700
From:	Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, dcbw@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 1/3] ipvlan: Defer multicast / broadcast processing
 to a work-queue

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:28 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:54:29 -0700
>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 14:29 -0700, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
>>>
>>>> +static void ipvlan_multicast_enqueue(struct ipvl_port *port,
>>>> +                                  struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_PAUSE))
>>>> +             return;
>>>
>>> But what happens to this packet ? It seems leaked ?
>>>
>> Hmm, will take care of it in v2.
>
> Please also provide a proper "[PATCH 0/3] " introduction posting
> stating what the patch series is doing, and why.
>
Will do.

> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html