[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 14:02:52 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: emunson@...mai.com, tom@...bertland.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: provide SYN headers for passive
connections
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 16:05 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> Applied, but I think you should give maybe a little bit more thought
> into the behavior when a not-large-enough buffer is supplied by the
> user.
>
> Since we're talking about things on the order of 60 bytes or so at
> most, it seems clear to me that signalling an error is probably the
> most advisable thing to do in this situation.
>
> Maybe you could signal an error, yet write the actual length to
> "optlen". That way the user can figure out how much they need. Then
> they at least would have the option of retrying with a larger buffer.
Seems fine to me, I'll provide a patch implementing your suggestions.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists