netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 2/2] igb: support SIOCSMIIREG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 May 2015 12:57:48 -0400
From:	Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
CC:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	"Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@...el.com>,
	"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
	"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
	"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	"Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...ulusnetworks.com" <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	"shm@...ulusnetworks.com" <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Alan Liebthal <alanl@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 2/2] igb: support SIOCSMIIREG

On 5/7/15 4:46 PM, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
>> On May 7, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> index 720b785..1071a71 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> @@ -7141,6 +7141,11 @@ static int igb_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
>>>   			return -EIO;
>>>   		break;
>>>   	case SIOCSMIIREG:
>>> +		adapter->hw.phy.addr = data->phy_id;
>>> +		if (igb_write_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, data->reg_num & 0x1F,
>>> +				      data->val_in))
>>> +			return -EIO;
>>> +		break;
>>>   	default:
>>>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>   	}
>>
>> How and why is this being used?  From what I can tell it looks like it is an easy way to break any of the existing interfaces if it is misused since all you would need to do is specify a phy address that doesn't match the existing PHY in the system and then you would likely lose link, or possibly mess up the configuration on the system requiring.
>>
>> I suspect this is a back door for some piece of user space code that is being given far more permission than it should be.
>
> I don't know about a back door, but the real problem is that it has a
> side-effect of changing the saved value of the phy addr. That is clearly
> a problem and can't be allowed.

This patch was worse before... it had changes in SIOGMIIREG that had 
similar side-effects, missed this one.

Checking with some of the platform people here this patch can be 
dropped. We don't use it as a backdoor of any kind it was mainly used 
for debugging/guess-what-the-phy-addr-was when we originally got the boards.
>
> For the phylib stuff to really work as intended, the igb_write_phy_reg
> really should take the phy address as a parameter instead of getting
> the value from the structure itself. Or a new function should be
> defined that has that interface.
>
> --
> Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html