netdev - Re: [PATCH -next] net: sched: use counter to break reclassify loops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 14:44:10 +0200
From:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: sched: use counter to break reclassify loops

Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 05/13/15 07:29, Florian Westphal wrote:
> >Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> >Yes, but, if we use your example above then:
> >
> >tc_classify called
> >   limit 0
> >     tc_classify_compat called, ret RECLASSIFY
> >   limit 1
> >     tc_classify_compat called, ret RECLASSIFY
> >   limit 2
> >     tc_classify_compat called, ret PIPE (== 3)
> >   tc_classify returns 3
> >tc_classify called
> >   limit 0
> >   ...
> >
> >So we don't toss skb since any return value other than RECLASSIFY
> >will make tc_classify() return to its caller, and when caller invokes
> >tc_classify again the limit variable is set to 0 again.
> >
> >Does that make sense to you?
> >
> 
> I think you are right.

[..]

> In any case, lets not slow this down; please add my acked-by and if
> i can think of something i will post. I have to take off, so i will go
> quiet for a while.

Ok.  Again, many thanks Jamal for all the help you've provided.

In case you were not aware: thanks to patchwork its enough to reply with

Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>

... and it will be appended to the patch automagically.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html