netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/2] ipv6: do not delete previously existing ECMP routes if add fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 22:06:56 +0200
From:	Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To:	roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] ipv6: do not delete previously existing ECMP
 routes if add fails

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:30:20AM -0700, roopa wrote:
> >
> This looks like a similar bug i was trying to fix some time back:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/362296/
> 
> (I am not sure if my full patch is still valid. I was thinking of
> re-spining it sometime soon. If you are interested in trying it out,
> please do)

It's essentially the same idea but I prefer to use variable remaining
which is already there and is needed anyway rather than introduce
three extra variables for the cleanup (which is quite similar to the
suggestion from Hannes' reply).

I've sent v2 few minutes ago.

                                                       Michal Kubecek

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html