netdev - Re: [PATCH net] udp: fix behavior of wrong checksums

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 31 May 2015 21:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] udp: fix behavior of wrong checksums

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 09:16:53 -0700

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> We have two problems in UDP stack related to bogus checksums :
> 
> 1) We return -EAGAIN to application even if receive queue is not empty.
>    This breaks applications using edge trigger epoll()
> 
> 2) Under UDP flood, we can loop forever without yielding to other
>    processes, potentially hanging the host, especially on non SMP.
> 
> 
> This patch is an attempt to make things better.
> 
> We might in the future add extra support for rt applications
> wanting to better control time spent doing a recv() in a hostile
> environment. For example we could validate checksums before queuing
> packets in socket receive queue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Yeah this looks correct, applied and queued up for -stable.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html