netdev - Re: [PATCH 7/7] mac80211: Switch to new AEAD interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:42:41 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mac80211: Switch to new AEAD interface

On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 15:21 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:

> Just a short question on ieee80211_aes_ccm_encrypt, ieee80211_aes_ccm_decrypt, 
> ieee80211_aes_gcm_encrypt, ieee80211_aes_gcm_decrypt, ieee80211_aes_gmac: can 
> the aad parameter of these functions be zero?

What do you mean by "zero"? The pointer itself can clearly never be
NULL.

The contents, now, that's a more interesting question. I believe it can
never be all zeroes, since association request frames are not
encrypted/protected and thus at least one byte in here must be non-zero.
The MAC addresses are also very likely non-zero, but technically
00:00:00:00:00:00 is a valid MAC address I believe.

johannes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html