lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 08:24:27 -0700 From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> CC: ebiederm@...ssion.com, rshearma@...cade.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Summary lightweight tunnel discussion at NFWS On 7/6/15, 6:03 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > The integration into the routing code looks much better now. Any > chance you can rebase your tree and squash it into logical > commits? Will do today. > I'm rebasing again onto yours and I think we should submit > all of this in a single series so everything can be reviewed in a > single thread. agreed. > > All of this is only useful if distros enable this by default which > minimize the value of a config option quite a bit. I think what you > have your latest tree is a good balance. ok > >> I have been thinking of moving lwtstate from rtable to struct dst_entry. >> I will also look at the dst_metadata. > I thought about the same. The introduction of dst_metadata makes > that a bit pointless because we don't want to store a pointer to the > tunnel metadata but allocate the metadata as a dst directly to avoid > the indirection. We need the separate code paths anyway until v6 and > v4 routing are merged so we would save very little while penalizing > everyone except rtable and fib6. agreed, thanks, Roopa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists