| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:24:41 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sctp: add new getsockopt option SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL
On 15-07-2015 10:18, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:13:24PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>> SCTP has this operation to peel off associations from a given socket and
>> create a new socket using this association. We currently have two ways
>> to use this operation:
>> - via getsockopt(), on which it will also create and return a file
>> descriptor for this new socket
>> - via sctp_do_peeloff(), which is for kernel only
>>
>> The caveat with using sctp_do_peeloff() directly is that it creates a
>> dependency to SCTP module, while all other operations are handled via
>> kernel_{socket,sendmsg,getsockopt...}() interface. This causes the
>> kernel to load SCTP module even when it's not really used.
>>
>> This patch then creates a new sockopt that is to be used only by kernel
>> users of this protocol. This new sockopt will not allocate a file
>> descriptor but instead just return the socket pointer directly.
>>
>> Kernel users are actually identified by if the parent socket has or not
>> a fd attached to it. If not, it's a kernel a user.
>>
>> If called by an user application, it will just return -EPERM.
>>
>> Even though it's not intended for user applications, it's listed under
>> uapi header. That's because hidding this wouldn't add any extra security
>> and to keep the sockopt list in one place, so it's easy to check
>> available numbers to use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/sctp.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>> net/sctp/socket.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h b/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
>> index ce70fe6b45df3e841c35accbdb6379c16563893c..b3aad3ce456ab3c1ebf4d81fdb7269ba40b3d92a 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
>> @@ -105,6 +105,10 @@ typedef __s32 sctp_assoc_t;
>> #define SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_ADD 100 /* BINDX requests for adding addrs */
>> #define SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM 101 /* BINDX requests for removing addrs. */
>> #define SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF 102 /* peel off association. */
>> +#define SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL 103 /* peel off association.
>> + * only valid for kernel
>> + * users
>> + */
>> /* Options 104-106 are deprecated and removed. Do not use this space */
>> #define SCTP_SOCKOPT_CONNECTX_OLD 107 /* CONNECTX old requests. */
>> #define SCTP_GET_PEER_ADDRS 108 /* Get all peer address. */
>> @@ -892,6 +896,14 @@ typedef struct {
>> int sd;
>> } sctp_peeloff_arg_t;
>>
>> +/* This is the union that is passed as an argument(optval) to
>> + * getsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL).
>> + */
>> +typedef union {
>> + sctp_assoc_t associd;
>> + struct socket *socket;
>> +} sctp_peeloff_kernel_arg_t;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Peer Address Thresholds socket option
>> */
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> index f1a65398f3118ab5d3a884e9c875620560e6b5ef..7968de7a1aeabd5cd0a0398461dbf2081bd4c5b7 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> @@ -4504,6 +4504,39 @@ out:
>> return retval;
>> }
>>
>> +static int sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_kernel(struct sock *sk, int len,
>> + char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
>> +{
>> + sctp_peeloff_kernel_arg_t peeloff;
>> + struct socket *newsock;
>> + int retval = 0;
>> +
>> + /* We only allow this operation if parent socket also hadn't a
>> + * file descriptor allocated to it, mainly as a way to make sure
>> + * that this is really a kernel socket.
>> + */
>> + if (sk->sk_socket->file)
>> + return -EPERM;
(A) --^
>> +
>> + if (len < sizeof(sctp_peeloff_kernel_arg_t))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + len = sizeof(sctp_peeloff_kernel_arg_t);
>> + if (copy_from_user(&peeloff, optval, len))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + retval = sctp_do_peeloff(sk, peeloff.associd, &newsock);
>> + if (retval < 0)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + peeloff.socket = newsock;
>> + if (copy_to_user(optval, &peeloff, len)) {
>> + sock_release(newsock);
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + }
>> +out:
>> + return retval;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* 7.1.13 Peer Address Parameters (SCTP_PEER_ADDR_PARAMS)
>> *
>> * Applications can enable or disable heartbeats for any peer address of
>> @@ -5991,6 +6024,10 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
>> case SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF:
>> retval = sctp_getsockopt_peeloff(sk, len, optval, optlen);
>> break;
>> + case SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_KERNEL:
>> + retval = sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_kernel(sk, len, optval,
>> + optlen);
>> + break;
> Do we need to do something here to prevent user space calls from inadvertently
> accessing this option?
>
> Neil
No because such protection is inside sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_kernel()
now, on point (A) above. It seemed better to keep this switch case
aligned and move this protection inside it.
Marcelo
>> case SCTP_PEER_ADDR_PARAMS:
>> retval = sctp_getsockopt_peer_addr_params(sk, len, optval,
>> optlen);
>> --
>> 2.4.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists