netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] route: allow to route in a peer netns via lwt framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:28:43 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, davem@...emloft.net
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] route: allow to route in a peer netns via lwt
 framework

On 7/23/15 8:22 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>   static netdev_tx_t loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>   				 struct net_device *dev)
>   {
> +	int nsid = skb_lwt_netns_info(skb);
>   	struct pcpu_lstats *lb_stats;
>   	int len;
>
> +	if (nsid >= 0) {
> +		struct net *peernet = get_net_ns_by_id(dev_net(dev), nsid);
> +
> +		if (!peernet) {

If nsid is > 0 then the peer namespace should exist right? So for this 
failure path why not increment tx_error stat?


> +			kfree_skb(skb);
> +			goto end;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_forward_skb(peernet->loopback_dev, skb);
> +		put_net(peernet);
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +
>   	skb_orphan(skb);
>
>   	/* Before queueing this packet to netif_rx(),

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html