netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/8] xen: Use the correctly the Xen memory terminologies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:35:54 +0100
From:	Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC:	<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/8] xen: Use the correctly the Xen memory
 terminologies

Hi Wei,

On 29/07/15 11:13, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:02:45PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index 7d50711..3b7b7c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static void xenvif_gop_frag_copy(struct xenvif_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb
>>  		} else {
>>  			copy_gop->source.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>>  			copy_gop->source.u.gmfn =
>> -				virt_to_mfn(page_address(page));
>> +				virt_to_gfn(page_address(page));
>>  		}
>>  		copy_gop->source.offset = offset;
>>  
>> @@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ static void xenvif_tx_build_gops(struct xenvif_queue *queue,
>>  		queue->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].source.offset = txreq.offset;
>>  
>>  		queue->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.u.gmfn =
>> -			virt_to_mfn(skb->data);
>> +			virt_to_gfn(skb->data);
>>  		queue->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>>  		queue->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.offset =
>>  			offset_in_page(skb->data);
> 
> Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> 
> One possible improvement is to change gmfn in copy_gop to gfn as well.
> But that's outside of netback code.

The structure gnttab_copy is part of the hypervisor interface. Is it
fine to differ on the naming between Xen and Linux?

Or maybe we could do the change in the public headers in Xen repo too.
Is it fine to do field renaming in public headers?

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html