netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] net/core/sock.c: sk_clone_lock() should only do get_net() if the parent is not a kernel socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:31:58 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	ajaykumar.hotchandani@...cle.com,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] net/core/sock.c: sk_clone_lock()
 should only do get_net() if the parent is not a kernel socket

On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:29 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

> > CC Eric Biederman
> >
> > It looks this should be submitted for 'net' tree, not 'net-next'
> >
> 
> It only affects TCP kernel sockets, and we only have few use cases in tree,
> and it looks like dlm does its own ->accpet(), so net-next should be fine.

Right, nobody uses NFS anymore I guess.

If bug was added in 4.2, fix should land in net tree.

Not sure why we should wait.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html