netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] xen: Use the correctly the Xen memory terminologies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:07:56 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
CC:	Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	<stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] xen: Use the correctly the Xen memory
 terminologies

On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 02:12 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> >     /*
> >    * We detect special mappings in one of two ways:
> > @@ -217,9 +232,13 @@ static inline unsigned long bfn_to_local_pfn(unsigned
> > long mfn)
> >     /* VIRT <-> MACHINE conversion */
> >   #define virt_to_machine(v)	(phys_to_machine(XPADDR(__pa(v))))
> > -#define virt_to_pfn(v)          (PFN_DOWN(__pa(v)))
> >   #define virt_to_mfn(v)		(pfn_to_mfn(virt_to_pfn(v)))
> >   #define mfn_to_virt(m)		(__va(mfn_to_pfn(m) << PAGE_SHIFT))
> > +#define virt_to_pfn(v)          (PFN_DOWN(__pa(v)))
> 
> This looks like unnecessary change.
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
> > b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
> > index 09dc447..25e3cce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
> > @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int xenfb_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev)
> >     static unsigned long vmalloc_to_mfn(void *address)
> >   {
> > -	return pfn_to_mfn(vmalloc_to_pfn(address));
> > +	return pfn_to_gfn(vmalloc_to_pfn(address));
> >   }
> 
> Are you sure? This will return vmalloc_to_pfn(address)).

I think that is OK: there is no behavioural change here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html