lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:30 -0400
From:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: reduce cpu usage under tcp memory pressure
 when SO_SNDBUF is set



On 08/11/2015 10:49 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 14:38 +0000, Jason Baron wrote:
>> From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
> 
>> In my testing, this brought a single threaad's cpu usage down from 100% to ~1%
>> while maintaining the same level of throughput.
>>
> 
> Hi Jason. Could you give more details on this test ?
> 
> How many flows are competing ?
> 
>

Yes, so the test case I'm using to test against is somewhat contrived.
In that I am simply allocating around 40,000 sockets that are idle to
create a 'permanent' memory pressure in the background. Then, I have
just 1 flow that sets SO_SNDBUF, which results in the: poll(), write() loop.

That said, we encountered this issue initially where we had 10,000+
flows and whenever the system would get into memory pressure, we would
see all the cpus spin at 100%.

So the testcase I wrote, was just a simplistic version for testing. But
I am going to try and test against the more realistic workload where
this issue was initially observed.

Thanks,

-Jason

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ