netdev - Re: [PATCH net] sctp: start t5 timer only when peer.rwnd == 0 and in SHUTDOWN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:49:37 -0300
From:	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:	Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:	network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, tgraf@...radead.org,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: start t5 timer only when peer.rwnd == 0 and in
 SHUTDOWN_PENDING

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:39:06PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> when A send a data to B, A close() to be in SHUTDOWN_PENDING state,
> but B neither claim his rwnd is 0 nor SACK this data, then A keep
> retransmiting this data. it should send abord after Max.Retrans
> times, only when peer.rwnd == 0 and more than Max.Retrans times, it
> will start t5 timer.
> 
> Fixes: f8d960524 ("sctp: Enforce retransmission limit during shutdown")
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---

changelog is confusing, please reword it, specially the last part.

>  net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> index 3ee27b7..7d9380c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> @@ -5412,7 +5412,8 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_6_3_3_rtx(struct net *net,
>  	SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_T3_RTX_EXPIREDS);
>  
>  	if (asoc->overall_error_count >= asoc->max_retrans) {
> -		if (asoc->state == SCTP_STATE_SHUTDOWN_PENDING) {
> +		if (!q->asoc->peer.rwnd &&
> +			asoc->state == SCTP_STATE_SHUTDOWN_PENDING) {
                    ^

Indentation issue here. 2nd if line should start where I marked.

Other than that, looks good to me.

>  			/*
>  			 * We are here likely because the receiver had its rwnd
>  			 * closed for a while and we have not been able to
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html