lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:11:09 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ido@...ery.com" <ido@...ery.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Sharon, Sara" <sara.sharon@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/3] iwlwifi: mvm: transfer the truesize to the last
 TSO segment

On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 06:21 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> 
> On 08/19/2015 11:39 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 19:17 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > 
> >> Hm.. how would net/core/tso.c avoid this?
> > 
> > Because a driver using these helpers keep around the original LSO packet
> > and frees it normally at TX completion time.
> > 
> 
> Which is why I can't really use it. The complexity is that I have to
> (ieee802.11 specification) split an LSO is several 802.11 packets. The
> maximal 802.11 packet I can send under ideal condition is 11K long or
> so. So I *must* generate several 802.11 frames from one single LSO
> packet. OTOH, I can have more than MSS bytes in a 802.11 A-MSDU.
> 

Who said you had to free original packet ? Just keep it around.

TCP will work better ( check skb_still_in_host_queue() helper if you
want to know why)

> Maybe what would help would be to be able to dynamically change the
> maximal size of an LSO packet. That would allow the wifi driver to
> ensure that the LSO can fit in a single 802.11 packet. Note that since
> the maximal length of the A-MSDU can vary based on link conditions
> (since there is only one CRC for the whole A-MSDU, you don't want long
> A-MSDUs in bad link conditions) the driver would need to be able to tell
> the TCP stack to modify the length of an LSO packet.
> To me, this sounds to be ... an overkill?

It is already doable. Check dev->gso_max_size ( and
netif_set_gso_max_size())

Make sure you do not reinvent the wheel ;)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ