lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:34:45 +0200 From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de> To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>, stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ipv6: Only create RTF_CACHE route after encountering pmtu exception Am 28.08.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Alexander Holler: > Am 28.08.2015 um 09:36 schrieb Martin KaFai Lau: >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:43:20AM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: >>> That's why I vote to check out if it's possible/reasonable to >>> backport this >>> series to the stable kernels. >> I have backported to 4.0.y without major issue, so possible. > > Sure, as this was likely one of the versions they've used to create the > patch. > >> I did try on 3.1x and gave up. >> >> It is a lot of changes, so I don't think it is a good idea for -stable. > > Depends on what you're expecting from a (stable) kernel. > > The patch description mentions what happens when a system deals with a > lot of other ipv6-systems and that problem is easy to exercise and to > value. > > Rating the information leak is harder, some people even won't understand > that this might be a problem. > > And now look at which kernel-versions are now used in new devices > (likely something <= 3.10, which is more than two years old), how long > they will be used, and make a guess about IPv6 usage in 5 years. > > Anyway, I've no insights about all the politics happening in the > background (e.g. stuff like the LTSI tree) and I've just wanted raise > awareness about that (imho important) patch series. Not to speak about phones, but those are most likely a problem of one specific company ;) Regards, Alexander Holler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists