netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Remove VRF change to udp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:05:33 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Remove VRF change to udp_sendmsg

On 8/31/15 11:02 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:29 AM, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> Remove the VRF change in udp_sendmsg to set the source address. The VRF
>> driver already has access to the packet on the TX path via the dst. It
>> can be used to update the source address in the header.
>>
>
> I don't understand this. The previous code was about selecting a
> source address for packets being sourced ed on a socket, but this new
> patch seems to essentially be doing SNAT in the VRF transmit path
> which  seems like a fundamentally different behavior. Is this really
> your intention?
>

The original code and this new code are only controlling FIB lookups 
which in turn set the source address. Functionally both versions do the 
same thing.

David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html