netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] stmmac: replace all pr_xxx by their dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:42:51 +0200
From:	LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	peppe.cavallaro@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] stmmac: replace all pr_xxx by their dev_xxx
 counterpart

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:42AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 15:14 +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > The stmmac driver use lots of pr_xxx functions to print information.
> > This is bad since we cannot know which device logs the information.
> > (moreover if two stmmac device are present)
> []
> > So this patch replace all pr_xxx by their dev_xxx counterpart.
> 
> Using
> 	netdev_<level>(priv->dev, ...
> instead of
> 	dev_<level>(priv->device,
> 
> would be more consistent with other ethernet devices.
> 

Ok

> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> []
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ bool stmmac_eee_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> >  			 */
> >  			spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> >  			if (priv->eee_active) {
> > -				pr_debug("stmmac: disable EEE\n");
> > +				dev_dbg(priv->device, "disable EEE\n");
> 
> 				netdev_dbg(priv->dev, ...)
> 
> > @@ -657,10 +657,10 @@ static int stmmac_init_ptp(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> >  		priv->adv_ts = 1;
> >  
> >  	if (netif_msg_hw(priv) && priv->dma_cap.time_stamp)
> > -		pr_debug("IEEE 1588-2002 Time Stamp supported\n");
> > +		dev_dbg(priv->device, "IEEE 1588-2002 Time Stamp supported\n");
> 
> And these netif_msg_<foo> could be
> 
> 	if (priv->dma_cap.timestamp)
> 		netif_dbg(priv, hw, priv->dev, ...);
> 
> 
Thanks for the tip, I will add a patch for replacing that.

Regards

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html