lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:32:46 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexander Larsson <alexl@...hat.com>, Cosimo Cecchi <cosimo@...lessm.com>, Dan Nicholson <nicholson@...lessm.com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, Rajalakshmi Srinivasaraghavan <raji@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Wire up 32-bit direct socket calls On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote: > On Friday 11 September 2015 11:54:50 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> To make sure I don't miss any (it seems I missed recvmmsg and sendmmsg for >> the socketcall case, sigh), this is the list of ipc syscalls to implement? >> >> sys_msgget >> sys_msgctl >> sys_msgrcv >> sys_msgsnd >> sys_semget >> sys_semctl >> sys_semtimedop >> sys_shmget >> sys_shmctl >> sys_shmat >> sys_shmdt >> >> sys_semop() seems to be unneeded because it can be implemented using >> sys_semtimedop()? >> > > Yes, that list looks right. IPC also includes a set of six sys_mq_* > call, but I believe that everyone already has those as they are not > covered by sys_ipc. > > For y2038 compatibility, we will likely add a new variant of > semtimedop that takes a 64-bit timespec. While the argument passed > there is a relative time that will never need to be longer than 68 > years, we need to accommodate user space that defines timespec > in a sane way, and converting the argument in libc would be awkward. > I missed sys_ipc entirely. Ingo, Thomas, want to just wire those up, too? I can send a patch next week, but it'll be as trivial as the socket one. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists