netdev - Re: List corruption on epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) an AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:07:05 +0100
From:	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
To:	Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Olivier Mauras <olivier@...ras.ch>,
	PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>
Subject: Re: List corruption on epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) an AF_UNIX socket

Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com> writes:
> this is an attempt to resurrect the thread initially started here:
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/353003
>
> As that patch fixed the issue for the mentioned reproducer, it did not
> fix the bug for the production code Olivier is using. :(
>
> Changing the reproducer only slightly allows me to trigger the following
> list debug splat (CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y) reliable within seconds -- even
> with the above linked patch applied:

The patch was

--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
 <at>  <at>  -2233,10 +2233,14  <at>  <at>  static unsigned int unix_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
 	writable = unix_writable(sk);
 	other = unix_peer_get(sk);
 	if (other) {
-		if (unix_peer(other) != sk) {
+		unix_state_lock(other);
+		if (!sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD) && unix_peer(other) != sk) {
+			unix_state_unlock(other);
 			sock_poll_wait(file, &unix_sk(other)->peer_wait, wait);
 			if (unix_recvq_full(other))
 				writable = 0;
+		} else {
+			unix_state_unlock(other);
 		}
 		sock_put(other);
 	}

That's obviously not going to help you when 'racing with
unix_release_sock' as the socket might be released immediately after the
unix_state_unlock, ie, before sock_poll_wait is called. Provided I
understand this correctly, the problem is that the socket reference
count may have become 1 by the time sock_put is called but the
sock_poll_wait has created a new reference to it which isn't accounted
for.

A simple way to fix that could be to do something like

unix_state_lock(other);
if (!sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD)) sock_poll_wait(...)
unix_state_unlock(other);

This would imply that unix_release_sock either marked the socket as dead
before the sock_poll_wait was executed or that the wake_up_interruptible
call in there will run after ->peer_wait was used (and it will thus
'unpollwait' it again).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html