netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: Fix Hisilicon Network Subsystem Support Compilation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:19:09 +0800
From:	huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
	<liguozhu@...ilicon.com>, <Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com>,
	<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
	<zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
	<kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
	<lisheng011@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: Fix Hisilicon Network Subsystem Support
 Compilation

On 2015/9/26 12:42, David Miller wrote:
> From: huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>
> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:29:50 +0800
>
>> @@ -191,9 +191,12 @@ static void hns_rcb_ring_init(struct ring_pair_cb *ring_pair, int ring_type)
>>   	if (ring_type == RX_RING) {
>>   		dsaf_write_dev(q, RCB_RING_RX_RING_BASEADDR_L_REG,
>>   			       (u32)dma);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>   		dsaf_write_dev(q, RCB_RING_RX_RING_BASEADDR_H_REG,
>>   			       (u32)(dma >> 32));
>> -
>> +#else
>> +		dsaf_write_dev(q, RCB_RING_RX_RING_BASEADDR_H_REG, 0);
>> +#endif
>>   		dsaf_write_dev(q, RCB_RING_RX_RING_BD_LEN_REG,
>>   			       bd_size_type);
>>   		dsaf_write_dev(q, RCB_RING_RX_RING_BD_NUM_REG,
> CONFIG_64BIT doesn't tell you if _DMA_ addresses are 64-bit or not.
>
> Furthermore there is a portable way to shift a 32-bit value down
> 32-bits whilst avoiding warnings.
>
> 	(x >> 31) >> 1
>
> So you should definitely use that instead of the CONFIG_64BIT test.
>
> .

agreed.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html